Bombay High Court
BHARATIYA GRAMIN PUNARRACHNA SANSTHA THR ITS SECRETARY EKNATH KHANDERAO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the State must decide on the petitioner's proposal within one week and, if approved, include the petitioner in the CAP round.
Summary
The Bharatiya Gramin Punarrachna Sanstha filed a writ petition seeking inclusion of its name in the CAP (Community Action Programme) round. The petition was filed on the grounds that the decision on its proposal dated 30/12/2025 was pending despite the ongoing CAP rounds. The High Court, noting the urgency of the matter, directed the State of Maharashtra (respondent No.1) to decide on the proposal within one week from the date of the order. The Court further ordered that, should the proposal be approved, the petitioner’s name be included in the CAP round. The parties were instructed to act upon the authenticated copy of the order.
Issues considered
- Whether the State must decide on the petitioner's proposal within a stipulated time in view of the urgency of the CAP rounds
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to be included in the CAP round upon approval of its proposal
Subjects
- CAP round
- writ petition
- urgency
- inclusion
- government decision
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:43881-DB
1 35-WP-13115-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 13115 OF 2026
BHARATIYA GRAMIN PUNARRACHNA SANSTHA THROUGH ITS
SECRETARY
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
...
Mr. N. B. Khandare, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. Shailendra S.
Gangakhedkar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Taking into consideration the urgency and as the CAP
rounds are going on, the writ petition is disposed of by directing
respondent No.1 to take decision on the proposal of the petitioner
dated 30/12/2025, within a period of one week from today.
2. In case the proposal of the petitioner is allowed by
respondent No.1, petitioner’s name be included in the CAP round.
3. Parties to act upon the authenticated copy.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…