Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR. INDRANIL KALYANKUMAR SENGUPTAversusMRS. BARKHA INDRANIL SENGUPTA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.

Summary

Petitioner Indranil Kalyankumar Sengupta filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against respondent Barkha Indranil Sengupta. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the matter had been settled out of court and sought withdrawal of the petition. The court considered the request and permitted the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of, and all pending applications were also dismissed. No substantive merits of the dispute were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and what procedure applies

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • settlement out of court
  • disposal of applications

Judgment

                                                                                              70-WP-13329-2025 (C).doc


                              N.S.Kamble


                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 13329 OF 2025

                              Mr. Indranil Kalyankumar Sengupta           ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                              Mrs. Barkha Indranil Sengupta               ...Respondent
                              ____________________________________________________________
                              Mr.Anshu M. Kushwaha, for the Petitioner.
                              Mr.Amai Anand (Through VC) i/b Mr.Zaman Ali, for the Respondent.
           Digitally signed
NILAM   by NILAM
        SANTOSH
                              ____________________________________________________________
SANTOSH KAMBLE
KAMBLE Date: 2026.09.17
           10:54:27 +0530                                         CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                  DATE           : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2026

                              P.C. :

                              .              Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for

                              the Respondent.

                              2.             The learned counsel for the Petitioner submit that matter is

                              settled out of the Court and requested for withdrawal of this Petition.

                              3.             Considering the request of the learned counsel for the Petitioner,

                              the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.

                              4.             All pending Applications are disposed of.



                                                                                 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                   Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.