Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ABDULJABBAR ABDULSATTAR BARASKAR AND ORSversusMUSLIM EDUCATION COMITTEE THR. ITS PRESIDENT AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court directed the Assistant Charity Commissioner to decide the pending applications expeditiously, allowing the intervenor to raise objections, without staying the Commissioner’s jurisdiction despite the record being sent to the Waqf Board.

Summary

The petitioners sought a court direction for the Assistant Charity Commissioner of Sangli to decide their pending applications for membership in a trust dating from 2025. The Muslim Education Committee, as intervenor, opposed the applications and filed an interim application for intervention, which was allowed. The court held that it could merely direct the Commissioner to adjudicate the applications expeditiously, leaving the intervenor free to appear and raise objections. The Attorney General of the State indicated that the entire record had been forwarded to the Waqf Board, but the Commissioner retained authority to pass an order in accordance with law. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed, directing the Commissioner to decide the applications promptly.

Issues considered

  • Can the High Court direct the Assistant Charity Commissioner to adjudicate pending membership applications to a trust?
  • Does the intervenor have the right to appear before the Commissioner and raise objections?
  • Does the forwarding of the record to the Waqf Board affect the Commissioner’s jurisdiction to decide the applications?

Subjects

  • Waqf
  • Trust
  • Charity Commissioner
  • Intervention
  • Membership
  • Writ Petition
  • Expeditious decision

Judgment

                                                                                               109-WP-1333-2026.doc



          Digitally signed
          by HARISH                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
HARISH    VITHAL
VITHAL    CHAUDHARI
CHAUDHARI Date:
          2026.10.08
                                                    CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
          10:54:09 +0530
                                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2026

                             Abduljabbar Abdulsattar Baraskar And Others              ...Petitioners
                                       Versus
                             Muslim Education Comittee Thr. Its President             ...Respondents
                             And Others

                                                             WITH
                                          INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 3834 OF 2026
                                                              IN
                                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2026

                             Muslim Education Comittee Thr. Its Secretary             ...Applicants
                             And Others
                                       Versus
                             Abduljabbar Abdulsattar Baraskar And Others              ...Respondents

                                                              ——————
                             Mr. P. D. Dalvi a/w Tejas Shelake & Sonal Nalawade for the Petitioner.
                             Mr. Atul P. Vanarase, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                             Mr. Akshay Kulkarni (Through V. C.) for the Applicant in IA.
                                                              ——————
                                                                Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                            Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                                Date      : October 07, 2026.
                             P. C. :

                             [i]       ORDER IN INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 3834 OF 2026

                             1.        The Application has been preferred seeking intervention in the

                             present proceedings by the Muslim Education Committee.



                             Harish                              1 of 2
                                                               109-WP-1333-2026.doc




2.       For the reasons stated, the application is allowed.

3.       The interim application is disposed of accordingly.


[ii]     ORDER IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2026

1.       The limited relief in the writ petition is for a direction to the

Assistant Charity Commissioner, Sangli to decide their applications,

which are pending with the Assistant Charity Commissioner since the

year 2025, seeking to be enrolled as members of the respondent No. 1

Trust.

2.       The intervenor opposes the said applications.

3.       As the petitioners are only seeking a direction to adjudicate their

applications, the petition can be disposed of by directing the Assistant

Charity Commissioner to decide their applications expeditiously. The

intervenor in the present petition is at liberty to appear before the

Assistant Charity Commissioner and raise all objections. All contentions

of all the parties are expressly kept open.

4.       Learned AGP submits, on instructions, that the entire record has

been sent to the Waqf Board. In such event, it is open for the Assistant

Charity Commissioner to pass an appropriate order in accordance with

law.

5.       The petition is disposed of in the above term.


 [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                        [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]


Harish                              2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.