Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUNNY DHARMVIR BIDLAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Sunny Dharmvir Bidla filed a writ petition (No. 13343 of 2022) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was heard before a two‑judge bench of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad. After hearing on merits, the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. To avoid any adverse observations, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • court discretion

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42986-DB
                                                                            77.WP.13343.2022.doc



                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 13343 OF 2022

          Sunny Dharmvir Bidla                                          ...Petitioner

                   Versus

          The State of Maharashtra and Others                 ...Respondents
                                           ***
           Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
           Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondent – State.
           Ms. Rani Bharuka – Bora h/f Mr. S. S. Bora, Advocate for Respondent
            No.2.
                                           ***
                                     CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                            DATE      : 16th SEPTEMBER 2026.
          PER COURT :

          1.                 After arguing on merits when this Court was not inclined to

          grant relief, learned advocate for the Petitioner so as to avoid adverse

          observations against the Petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the

          writ petition.


          2.                 Permission is granted.


          3.                 Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.




               ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. )                ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )




          Shrikant Malani                                                            Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.