Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTDversusMR. VIKRAM TRIVEDI AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Mr. Vikram Trivedi and another. The petitioner failed to appear before the court, even on the date of hearing on 20 July 2026. The court observed that the petitioner had lost interest in prosecuting the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the dispute were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the court.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural default

Judgment

                      Neeta Sawant                                           16-WP-13544-2022.docx


                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 13544 OF 2022


                      Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.                                  …..Petitioner


                                 : Versus :


                      Mr. Vikram Trivedi & Anr.                                 ….Respondents


                      None for the Petitioner.




                                                               CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                                                               DATED :   10 SEPTEMBER 2026.


                      P.C :



                      1)              None appears for the Petitioner. Even on 20 July 2026, none
                      had appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. It appears that the Petitioner
                      has lost interest in prosecuting the petition.        The Writ Petition is
                      dismissed for want of prosecution.

         Digitally
         signed by
         NEETA
NEETA    SHAILESH
SHAILESH SAWANT
SAWANT   Date:
         2026.09.11
                                                                     [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
         14:44:35
         +0530




                      _____________________________________________________________________________
                                                      PAGE NOS. 1 of 1
                                                   Thursday, 10 September 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.