Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUNIL BABU PAGIversusSR POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 3 December 2020 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner’s lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed. The dismissal was recorded by the two judges hearing the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue it

Subjects

  • non‑prosecution
  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                 ssm                                                     97-wp1356.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 1356 OF 2021

            Sunil Babu Pagi                                              …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            Sr. Police Inspector & Ors.                                  …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Shri. S. V. Gavand APP, for the Respondent-State.
                              ____________________________________

                                               CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            3rd December, 2020, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

            steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                           1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:03 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.