Bombay High Court
RIZWAN RASHID SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed as Withdrawn
Holding
The petition remains dismissed as withdrawn, and no further orders are required after compliance with the cost payment.
Summary
The petitioner, Rizwan Rashid Shaikh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. On 21 August 2026, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioner agreed to pay Rs.1,00,000 to Respondent No.2, citing manipulation of the record. The Court set a compliance date of 28 August 2026. On 31 August 2026, the petitioner claimed the cost payment had been made. The Court noted that the petition had already been dismissed as withdrawn and, with the cost complied, ordered no further action. The petition remains dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition dismissed as withdrawn can be reopened after the petitioner claims compliance with a cost order
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- cost payment
- compliance
- High Court
Judgment
13 WP-1358-2026.DOC
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1358 OF 2026
Rizwan Rashid Shaikh …Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Prathamesh T. Bhanuwanshe i/b Sanjay P. Shinde, for the
Petitioner.
Mr. Mayur Sonavane, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
P. C.:
1. This Court passed the following order on 21st August, 2026 :-
“1. After arguing the matter for considerable time,
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on
instructions from the petitioner, seeks withdrawal of
the petition. However, as factual position on record
clearly shows that the petitioner has manipulated the
record, the petitioner who is present in Court states
that he will pay cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to Respondent
No.2 within a period of one week from today.
2. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
3. Stand over to 28 August 2026 at 3:00 p.m. to ensure
compliance of this order.”
Page 1 of 2
31st August, 2026
13 WP-1358-2026.DOC
skt
2. Today, the matter is kept for compliance of payment of costs
of Rs.1,00,000/- to Respondent No. 2.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the
said order dated 21st August, 2026 is complied with.
4. As the Petition is already dismissed as withdrawn by order
dated 21st August, 2026, no further orders are required.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 2 of 2
31st August, 2026
Checking your session…