Bombay High Court
SHRI. RAHUL PRAKASH TANKSALEversusSHASHIKANT SHANKAR TANKSALE THROUGH POA SHRI. ABHAY S. TANKSALE AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- VRUSHALI V JOSHI
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the underlying suit was already disposed of.
Summary
Rahul Prakash Tanksale filed a writ petition challenging a civil dispute with Shashikant Shankar Tanksale. The respondents, represented by counsel Parth Katira, contended that the underlying suit had already been disposed of by the Lok Adalat on 7 May 2022. They argued that this prior disposal rendered the present writ petition infructuous. The Court examined whether the petition could continue in view of the earlier disposal. Finding that the suit's final resolution precluded any further relief, the Court held the petition could not be entertained. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the underlying suit has already been disposed of by the Lok Adalat.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- Lok Adalat
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- petition dismissal
Judgment
11-WP-136-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.136 OF 2016
Shri. Rahul Prakash Tanksale …..Petitioner
Vs.
Shashikant Shankar Tanksale
Through Poa Shri. Abhay S. Tanksale & Anr …..Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Parth Katira, (through vc) for the Respondents.
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 24th MARCH 2026
P.C.:-
1. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondents submit that the
suit was already disposed of on 7th May 2022 before the Lok Adalat.
Hence, the present petition has become infructuous.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)
Suresh 1/1
Checking your session…