Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RANSON ROYCE ANTHONYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition (No. 1362 of 2021) was filed by Ranson Royce Anthony before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after 14 December 2020, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • court dismissal
  • procedural default
  • petitioner's non‑appearance

Judgment

                 ssm                                                   99-wp1362.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 1362 OF 2021

            Ranson Royce Anthony                                       …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.
                              ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE :      29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, after 14th December 2020, neither the

            Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

            even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                         (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                         1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:01 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.