Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH LATIF SHAIKH CHAND AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to adopt appropriate civil remedies.

Summary

The petitioners Shaikh Latif, Shaikh Chand and others filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed its reluctance to interfere with the impugned order. Consequently, the petitioners, on their counsel's instructions, sought to withdraw the petition while reserving the right to pursue appropriate civil remedies. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with liberty as prayed. No substantive merits of the original challenge were addressed, and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court should interfere with the impugned order challenged in the criminal writ petition
  • Whether the petition can be withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal writ petition
  • high court
  • non-interference
  • civil rights remedy

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:27464
                                                                        924-WP-1363-2023.odt



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1363 OF 2023

                              Shaikh Latif Shaikh Chand And Others
                                              VERSUS
                             The State Of Maharashtra And Another
                                                 ...
          Mr. Vrishabh Patil h/f Mr. S. S. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioners
          Mr. S. G. Joshi, APP for Respondent/State
                                                 ...

                                                            CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J
                                                            DATE  : JULY 10, 2026

          P. C. :

          1.           After hearing learned Counsels for both sides and when this

          Court his shown its disinclination to cause interference in the impugned

          order, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks withdrawal

          of the Petition with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy in respect of his civil

          rights in accordance with law.


          2.           Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.


                                                                (R. M. JOSHI, J.)
          Malani




                                             Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.