Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NOORUDDIN ISMAIL QURESHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 12 December 2020 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                       100-wp1366.2021.doc

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 1366 OF 2021

            Nooruddin Ismail Qureshi                                       …..Petitioner

                       Vs.

            State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                    …..Respondents

                                  ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Shri. Ajay Patil APP, for the Respondent-State.
                               ____________________________________

                                                 CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                              KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                   DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)               None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)               Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            12th December, 2020, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

            steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)             It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)               Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                        (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                              1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:01 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.