Bombay High Court
MR. HARISHCHANDRA GOVIND VAITYversusSHRI. CHANDRAKANT LAXMAN SHELAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
A writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution where the petitioner fails to appear or be represented.
Summary
The petitioner, Shabnoor Ayub, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. No counsel or representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing. The court also noted that the petitioner had not appeared on any earlier occasion. Because of this lack of representation, the court held that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear or be represented?
Subjects
- Writ Petition
- Non‑prosecution
- Dismissal
- Civil Procedure
Judgment
28-wp-13696-2018.doc
Shabnoor
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13696 OF 2018
SHABNOOR Harishchandra Govind Vaity … Petitioner
AYUB
PATHAN V/s.
Digitally signed by
SHABNOOR AYUB
Chandrakant Laxman Shelar … Respondent
PATHAN
Date: 2026.08.17
15:33:40 +0530
None for the petitioner.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : AUGUST 17, 2026
P.C.:
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Even on the earlier occasion no one had appeared on behalf
of the petitioner.
3. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…