Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAVI KISHOR GANATRAversusSENIOR INSPECTOR JUHU POLICE STATION AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Ravi Kishor Ganatra, filed a writ petition on 11 December 2020 but failed to appear for any hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel circulated the petition even once after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was deemed abandoned. The judges dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution, thereby terminating the proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • petition dismissal
  • non‑prosecution
  • court procedure
  • writ petition

Judgment

                 ssm                                                       102-wp1379.2021.doc

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 1379 OF 2021

            Ravi Kishor Ganatra                                            …..Petitioner

                       Vs.

            Senior Inspector
            Juhu Police Station & Anr.                                     …..Respondents

                                  ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Shri. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
                               ____________________________________

                                                 CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                              KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                   DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)               None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)               Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            11th December, 2020, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

            steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)             It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)               Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                        (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                              1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:02 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.