Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHINY PANIGRAHIversusABHINASH MOHAPATRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is allowed and the subordinate court must dispose of the Hindu marriage petition within one year.

Summary

The petitioner, Vaishali Shiny Panigrahi, filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious hearing and disposal of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 280 of 2023 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, which had been delayed for about three years. The High Court considered whether it could direct a subordinate court to accelerate the proceedings. After hearing counsel for both parties and the State, the Court held that the delay warranted intervention. It allowed the writ petition and ordered the Civil Judge to dispose of the marriage petition as early as possible, preferably within one year of the order. The writ petition was consequently disposed of in favor of the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can issue a direction to a subordinate court to expedite a pending Hindu marriage petition due to undue delay?

Subjects

  • Hindu marriage
  • Writ petition
  • Expeditious disposal
  • Civil Procedure Code
  • Judicial delay

Judgment

                                                                              86-WP-13859-2025 (C).doc

                   Tikam

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 13859 OF 2025

VAISHALI               Shiny Panigrahi                                            ...Petitioner/s
ANIL                   VERSUS
TIKAM
                       Abhinash Mohapatra And Anr                                 ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
                       _________________________________________________________________
2026.09.07
13:48:56 +0530
                       Mr. Harsh P. Dedhia, Advocate for Petitioner.
                       Mr. Dhrumil Joshi. Advocate for Respondent No.1.
                       Ms. Dhruti Kapadia, AGP for State.
                       _________________________________________________________________

                                                              CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                              DATE        :   2nd SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                       P.C. :

                       1.         Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, Respondent No.1 and

                       learned AGP for State.

                       2.         By this Petition, the Petitioner is seeking to expedite the hearing

                       and dispose of the Hindu Marriage Petition No. 280 of 2023 pending

                       before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel.

                       3.          I have heard all learned counsel. Considering the submissions

                       of all learned counsel and as the Marriage Petition is pending around three

                       years, I pass following order:

                                                         ORDER

                       (i)        Writ Petition is allowed.

                       (ii)       The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel shall expedite the



                                                        Page 1 of 2
                                                           86-WP-13859-2025 (C).doc

Tikam

    hearing of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 280 of 2023 and disposed of as

    early as possible, preferably within one year after receipt of this order.

               Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.



                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                      Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.