Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMAPPA BALASAHEB MAHAJANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court granted permission to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

Ramappa Balasheb Mahajan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later moved the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the purpose of filing it had been served. The Court considered the petitioner's request and, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original petition were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition before the High Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44537-DB


                                                                      wp13944-18.doc
                 drp
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO.13944 OF 2018

                 Ramappa Balasheb Mahajan                             PETITIONER

                        VERSUS

                 The State of Maharashtra and Others                 RESPONDENTS

                                             .......
                 Mr. Mahesh B. Karande, Advocate for the Petitioner
                 Ms. Neha B. Kamble, AGP for Respondent - State
                                             .......

                              [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                       ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]

                                      DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026

                 ORDER :

                 1.     Not on Board. Upon mentioning taken on Board.


                 2.     Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the

                 purpose of filing the Writ Petition is served. Hence, he seeks

                 permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.


                 3.     Permission is granted.


                 4.     Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.



                 [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]                  [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
                        JUDGE                                       JUDGE

                 drp/wp13944-18.doc


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.