Bombay High Court
DEVJYOTI SHASHANKSHEKHAR CHATTERJEEversusTRIPTI DEVJYOTI CHATTERJEE ALIAS TANU
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
A writ petition may be withdrawn upon the parties' request and the court's discretion, and the court may order its dismissal.
Summary
The petitioners, Tripti Devjyoti Chatterjee (alias Tanu) and Devjyoti Shashankshekhar Chatterjee, filed reciprocal writ petitions (WP No. 12312 of 2025 and WP No. 13969 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court. Both parties later settled the disputes out of court. Their counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the petitions. The learned counsel for the petitioner in both matters and the counsel for the respondent in each petition jointly requested withdrawal. The Court, after hearing the submissions, exercised its discretion to allow the withdrawal of both writ petitions. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed and disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition filed in the High Court may be withdrawn upon the parties' request after settlement out of court.
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- settlement out of court
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
70-WP-12312-2025 (C).doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12312 OF 2025
Tripti Devjyoti Chatterjee Alias Tanu ...Petitioner
VERSUS
Devjyoti Shashankshekhar Chatteerjee
@Rama Chatterjee ...Respondent
Digitally signed
SONALI SATISH
by SONALI
KILAJE
SATISH Date:
KILAJE 2026.09.02
14:59:17 +0530
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 13969 OF 2025
Devjyoti Shashankshekhar Chatterjee ...Petitioner
VERSUS
Tripti Devjyoti Chatterjee @ Tanu ...Respondent
_________________________________________________________________
Advocate Kiran Jadhav a/w. Mr. Yash Kamble and Mr. Shubham Kadam
i/b. Mr. Randhir Kale, for Petitioner in WP/12312/2025 and for
Respondent in WP/13969/2025.
Mr. Kishorekumar Shetty, Advocate for Respondent in WP/12312/2025
and for Petitioner in WP/13969/2025.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for
the respondent in both the petitions.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner in both the Petitions submit
that both the matters are settled out of Court and on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw both the petitions.
3. Considering the submission of both the learned counsel, both
Page 1 of 2
70-WP-12312-2025 (C).doc
S.S.Kilaje
the Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn.
4. Dismissed and disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…