Bombay High Court
REKHA RAJENDRA SINGHAVI, PROP./AUTH SIGNA HARI TEXTILESversusKAVITA ENTERPRISES PROP. SOU. KAVITA DAULTCHAND DAGA
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The petition was allowed to be withdrawn and was disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
Rekha Rajendra Singhavi filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 15-10-2025 passed by the JMFC in S.C.C. No. 2041/2017 and to direct issuance of summons to the ICICI Bank manager. The petitioner, through counsel Himanshu Pujari, later sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating that the merits of the underlying case would remain open. The respondent's counsel, Dr. A. A. Takalkar, did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the petitioner's request and the lack of opposition, granted leave to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural course when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a criminal writ petition after filing reliefs?
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- withdrawal
- quash order
- procedural law
Judgment
501-WP-140-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 140 OF 2026
Rekha Rajendra Singhavi,
Prop./Auth Signa Hari Textiles … Petitioner
Versus
Kavita Enterprises Prop. Sou.
Kavita Daultchand Daga … Respondent
__________________________________________________________
Mr. Himanshu Pujari i/b Irfan Jamadar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Dr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. Mahesh Mane, Solapur Rural
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 24th August, 2026.
P.C. :
1. This Petition is circulated pursuant to the praecipe dated
24.08.2026. In view of the urgency expressed by Mr. Himanshu
Pujari, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, this Petition was
ordered to be placed on “Production Board.”
2. By the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought for the
following substantive relief in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b):-
(a) Quash and set aside the order dated 15/10/2025
passed by the Learned JMFC, 3rd Court, Ichalkaranji in
S.C.C. No. 2041/2017;
(b) Allow the application (Exh-119) filed by the
Petitioner and direct issuance of summons to the Branch
Arjun 1
501-WP-140-2026.doc
Manager, ICICI Bank, Ichalkaranji, along with relevant
bank records;
3. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Himanshu
Pujari, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, sought a passover to
take instructions from the Petitioner. At his request, this Petition
was taken up after some time.
4. Mr. Himanshu Pujari, learned Advocate for the Petitioner,
on instructions from the Petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this
Petition. He submits that all the contentions of the Petitioner on
merits of the case bearing No. 2041 of 2017 be left open.
5. The request made by Mr. Himanshu Pujari, learned
Advocate for the Petitioner, is not opposed by Mr. A. S.
Shalgaonkar, learned APP for the Respondent – State.
6. In view of the statement made by Mr. Himanshu Pujari,
learned Advocate for the Petitioner, leave is granted to withdraw
the present Petition.
7. Criminal Writ Petition No. 140 of 2026 is disposed of as
withdrawn.
Digitally (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
signed by
ARJUN
ARJUN KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE Date: Arjun 2
2026.08.25
16:10:15
+0530
Checking your session…