Bombay High Court

ROSHANI SHIVAJI SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that the present writ petitions are barred by the earlier decisions and therefore dismissed.

Summary

Shraddha Rajendra Mokase filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11911/2025, 12201/2024, 12896/2024, 14090/2024, 10487/2024, 11117/2024, 11972/2025) against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates. The bench observed that the matters raised are fully covered by two earlier decisions of this Court (Writ Petition No.13945/2025) and the Nagpur Bench (Writ Petition No.6482/2024). Relying on those precedents, the court found no ground to entertain the fresh petitions. Consequently, the writ petitions were dismissed without any order as to costs.

Issues considered

Whether the relief sought in the present writ petitions is maintainable in view of the earlier judgments in Writ Petition No.13945/2025 and Nagpur Bench Writ Petition No.6482/2024

Subjects

writ petition
dismissal
precedent
procedural default
court jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40661-DB
                                         1                           903.WP.11911.25.odt

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              WRIT PETITION NO. 11911 OF 2025
                                            WITH
                              WRIT PETITION NO. 12201 OF 2024
                                            WITH
                              WRIT PETITION NO. 12896 OF 2024
                                            WITH
                              WRIT PETITION NO. 14090 OF 2024
                                            WITH
                             CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7322 OF 2025
                                      IN WP/10487/2024
                                            WITH
                             CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7323 OF 2025
                                      IN WP/12896/2024
                                            WITH
                             CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7324 OF 2025
                                      IN WP/11117/2024
                                            WITH
                              WRIT PETITION NO. 10487 OF 2024
                                            WITH
                              WRIT PETITION NO. 11117 OF 2024
                                            WITH
                              WRIT PETITION NO. 11972 OF 2025

                                SHRADDHA RAJENDRA MOKASE
                                             VERSUS
                         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                ...
             Mr. S.R. Wakale, Ms. Neha B. Kamble, Mr. N.D. Batule, Mr. M.K. Goyanka
             and Mr. B.B. Bhise AGPs for Respondents/State
             Mr. S.R. Dheple advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3
             in (WP/11972/2025 and WP/11972/2025)
             Mr. C.A. Jadhav, advocate for Respondent No.4
             in (WP/11972/2025 and WP/11972/2025)
                                                 ...
             Mr. P.R. Nangare for respondent Nos.2 and 3 in (WP/12201/2024)
             Mr. C.A. Jadhav for respondent No.4 in (WP/12201/2024)
                                                 ...
             Mr. K.N. Lokhande, advocate for respondent Nos.11, 17 and 23
             (WP/10487/24)
             Ms. Sachin B. Munde, advocate for respondent No.13 (WP/10487/24)
                            2                            903.WP.11911.25.odt

Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi for respondent Nos.10,15, 16, 21 and 22
in (WP/10487/24)
Mr. U.B. Bondar for respondent Nos.12,18 and 24 in (WP/10487/24)
                                      ...
Mr. P.R. Nangare for respondent Nos.14 and 20 (WP/11117/2024)
Ms. Sachin B. Munde, advocate for respondent No.18 (WP/11117/24)
Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi for respondent No.9 in (WP/11117/24)
Mr. V.S. Bhosale, advocate for respondent No.16 (WP/11117/24)
Mr. U.B. Bondar for respondent Nos.20,34 and 48 in (WP/11117/24)
                                    ...
Ms. Sachin B. Munde, advocate for respondent No.12 (WP/12896/24)
Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi for respondent No.9 (WP/12896/24)
Mr. S.R. Dheple for respondent Nos.13 and 19 (WP/12896/24)
                                   …
Mr. P.R. Nangare for respondent Nos.2 and 3 (WP/14090/2024)
Mr. C.A. Jadhav for respondent No.4 (WP/14090/2024)
                                   ...

                     CORAM         : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                     ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                     DATE          : 03.09.2026


PER COURT:

1.    When these matters were called out on previous date i.e. on

01.09.2026, learned advocates for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submitted

that the issue raised in these petitions is squarely covered by the

decision of this Court in Writ Petition No.13945/2025 and by the

Nagpur Bench in writ petition No.6482/2024. However, since learned

advocate for the petitioners was not available on that date, the matters

were adjourned for today for disposal.

2.    Today when the matters were called out in the morning session
                                 3                        903.WP.11911.25.odt

none appears for the petitioners and the matters were kept back.

None appears for the petitioners even in the second session.

3.        The issue raised in this petitions is squarely covered by the

decision of this Court mentioned in the earlier paragraph. For the

reasons stated in the said order, the writ petitions are dismissed. There

shall be no order as to costs.



(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                  (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




habeeb/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…