Bombay High Court
ABHISEK MANISH BHATTACHARYAversusPAYEL BANERJEE
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Abhisek Manish Bhattacharya, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. No counsel was appointed for the petitioner and the petitioner did not appear on the last two hearing dates. The respondent, Payel Banerjee, was represented by Mr. Akhilesh Pote. The Court noted the petitioner’s non‑appearance and lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear and prosecute a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- court procedure
Judgment
75-WP-1415-2025 (C).doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1415 OF 2025
Abhisek Manish Bhattacharya ...Petitioner
VERSUS
Payel Banerjee ...Respondent
_________________________________________________________________
SONALI by
Digitally signed
SONALI
None for Petitioner.
SATISH KILAJE
SATISH Date:
2026.09.09 Mr. Akhilesh Pote, Advocate for Respondent.
KILAJE 13:50:47
+0530
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. None for the petitioner.
2. Heard learned counsel for the respondent.
3. On the last two dates none present for the petitioner.
4. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…