Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

EDISONS INFRAPOWER AND MALTIVENTURES PRIVATE LIMITEDversusKOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of as there was nothing further to adjudicate after the settlement.

Summary

The petitioners, Edisons Infrapower and Maltiventures Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court arising from a suit pending before the City Civil Court, Dindoshi. Their counsel informed the court that the dispute had been settled out of court and that the petitioners intended to withdraw the underlying suit. The court noted that, in view of the settlement and the withdrawal, there were no remaining matters for adjudication. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition. No substantive legal issues were addressed as the matter was resolved amicably.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed when the underlying dispute has been settled and the suit withdrawn

Subjects

  • settlement
  • withdrawal of suit
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • disposal of petition

Judgment

HEMANT
CHANDERSEN
SHIV
                      H.C. SHIV                                                               4.w14341.25.doc
Digitally signed by
HEMANT
CHANDERSEN SHIV
Date: 2026.06.08                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
11:29:36 +0300
                                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               WRIT PETITION NO.14341 OF 2025

                      Edisons Infrapower and
                      Maltiventures Pvt. Ltd.                               …. Petitioner
                            Vs.
                      Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Co. Ltd.              …. Respondents


                      Ms. Khushnumah Banerjee with Ms. Aashka Vora i/b Vidhii Partners for the
                      Petitioner.
                      Mr. Smit Singh, Authorised representative of Petitioner present.


                                                          CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
                                                          DATED : 5th JUNE, 2026
                                                                  (VACATION COURT)

                      P.C. :-

                      1)          Ms. Banerjee, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states
                      that the dispute between the parties has been settled outside the Court.
                      Ms.Banerjee, on instructions from Mr. Smit Singh, states that the Petitioner
                      will withdraw the suit filed before the City Civil Court, Dindoshi which
                      pertains to the said dispute. The present Petition arises out of the same suit.

                      2)          In view thereof, nothing further survives in this Petition and the
                      Petition stands disposed of, accordingly.


                                                                          (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)




                                                                                                          1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.