Bombay High Court
SHALINI SETHIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and directed the family court to decide the pending proceeding at the earliest.
Summary
Petitioner Shalini Sethi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition and asked that the pending family court proceedings be expedited. The Court considered the petitioner's request and allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition, directing the family court to decide the matter as early as possible. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, and the related interim application was also disposed of. No substantive merits of the underlying dispute were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and obtain a direction for the family court to expedite the pending proceeding
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- family court proceedings
- procedural law
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
87-WP-14397-2025 (C).doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14397 OF 2025
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6055 OF 2026
IN
SONALI by
Digitally signed
SONALI
WRIT PETITION NO. 14397 OF 2025
SATISH Date:
SATISH KILAJE
KILAJE 2026.08.28
14:40:46 +0530
Shalini Sethi … Petitioner
VERSUS
Union Of India And Ors … Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
Advocate Ratna Bhargavan i/b. Mr. Rahul Yadav, for Petitioner.
Mr. M.M.Chunawala, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Smt. A.A. Purav, AGP for Respondent No.2.
Mr. Ajit Kenjale, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
Mr. Dilip B. Shinde a/w. M.C.Kumbhar, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for
respondent No.1 learned AGP, learned counsel for respondent No.4 and
learned counsel for respondent No.5.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave
to withdraw the petition with direction to expedite the proceeding pending
before the Family Court.
3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the
petitioner, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
Page 1 of 2
87-WP-14397-2025 (C).doc
S.S.Kilaje
4. The learned Family Court shall decide the pending proceeding
as early as possible.
5. Writ Petition is disposed of.
6. In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Interim Application is also
disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…