Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SONALI TRUSHANT WALDEversusDHANANJAY PUNDALIK CHOUDHARI

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the petition was infractuous and therefore dismissed it.

Summary

Petitioner Sonali Trushant Walde filed a writ petition against respondent Dhananjay Pundalik Choudhari in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infractuous. The Court considered this submission. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition as infractuous. All pending applications related to the petition were also disposed.

Subjects

  • infractus
  • petition dismissed
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                                            83-WP-14518-2025 (C).doc


                             N.S.Kamble


                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 14518 OF 2025

                             Sonali Trushant Walde                       ...Petitioner
                             Versus
                             Dhananjay Pundalik Choudhari                ...Respondent
          Digitally signed
                             ____________________________________________________________
          by NILAM
NILAM   SANTOSH
SANTOSH KAMBLE               Ms.Dipti Jadhav i/b Mr.Abhijeet Kandarkar, for the Petitioner.
KAMBLE Date:
        2026.09.11
          14:57:46 +0530     Mr.Mahesh Pawar i/b Mr.Pratik Kalantri, for the Respondent.
                             ____________________________________________________________
                                                                 CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                 DATE           : 10th SEPTEMBER 2026

                             P.C. :

                             .              Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for

                             the Respondent.

                             2.             The learned counsel for the Petitioner submit that this Petition

                             has become infractuous.

                             3.             Considering the submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner,

                             the Petition is disposed of as infractuous.

                             4.             All pending Applications are disposed of.



                                                                                (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                  Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.