Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LUCKY @ DIPAK SANTOSH JAISWAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition shall be dismissed without further reference if the office objections are not removed within two weeks.

Summary

The petitioners, represented by Mr. M. M. Parghane on behalf of Mr. Pratik P. Kothari, sought an adjournment of their criminal writ petition. The State of Maharashtra was represented by Mrs. M. L. Sangit, while no counsel appeared for Respondent No. 2. The court noted that the office objections to the petition had not been removed. The judge ordered that the office objections must be cleared within two weeks. If the objections are not removed within that period, the petition will be dismissed without further reference to the court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition can be adjourned despite pending office objections
  • Whether the petition should be dismissed if office objections are not removed within the stipulated time

Subjects

  • adjournment
  • office objections
  • criminal writ petition
  • procedural order
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                               1               3CrWP1454.2019.odt


                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

                                         3 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1454 OF 2019

                                            Lucky @ Dipak Santosh Jaiswal And Others
                                                               VERSUS
                                                 The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
                                                                 ...
                             Mr. M. M. Parghane h/f Mr. Pratik P. Kothari - Advocate for the
                             Petitioners
                             Mrs. M. L. Sangit - APP for the State
                             Mr. Govind A. Kulkarni - Advocate for Respondent No. 2
                                                                 ...

                                                               CORAM :    NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

                                                               DATED :    22ND JUNE, 2026

                             PER COURT : -

                             1.           Learned Advocate Mr. Parghane holding for Mr. Kothari for
                             the Petitioners, seeks an adjournment.

                             2.           Learned AGP for the State is present. None appears for
                             Respondent No. 2.

                             3.           The office note indicates that the office objections have not
                             been removed.

                             4.           The office objections shall be removed within a period of
                             two (2) weeks, failing which the Petition shall stand dismissed without
                             further reference to the Court.

                                                                           [NEERAJ P. DHOTE]
                                                                                JUDGE

                             SG Punde




Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 23/06/2026 19:16:33


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.