Bombay High Court
AMIT GANPAT YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THORU.ITS PRINCIPAL SEC. STATE EXCISE DEPT AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Amit Ganpat Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the case, likely due to the passage of time. The court noted the lack of prosecution and, consequently, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed. The dismissal was pronounced by Justice Aarti Sathe on 6 October 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear or pursue the case
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
30-WP-14551-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14551 OF 2024
Amit Ganpat Yadav ...Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Maharashtra thr. Its Principal
Sec. State Excise Dept. and others ...Respondent(s)
_________________________________________________________________
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Rachana Harpale h/f Adv. N.P. Deshpande, for Respondent No. 5.
Adv. P.V. Nelson Rajan, AGP, for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM: AARTI SATHE, J.
DATE: 06th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C.
None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. It seems that the Petitioner has
lost interest in prosecuting the present Petition on account of passage of time. In
view thereof, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(AARTI SATHE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Tiwari
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.