Bombay High Court
AMOL PRABHAKAR PANDHAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. A.GP. AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Pandhare, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on two occasions. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The order was pronounced by Justice Shivkumar Dige on 31 August 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural response when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
88-WP-14972-2025 (C).doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14972 OF 2025
Amol Prabhakar Pandhare ...Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Thru. AGP. and anr. ...Respondent/s
_________________________________________________________________
None for Petitioner.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. None for the petitioner. On the last two ocassions also, none
was present for the petitioner.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR
KADAM
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR KADAM
Date: 2026.09.01
11:13:50 +0530 Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…