Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

TUSHAR PANDITRAO BHARTIYAversusTHE RETURNING/ ELECTION OFFICER, (THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to the parties to pursue any other statutory remedies.

Summary

Tushar Panditrao Bhartiya filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the Returning/Election Officer and other officials. The petition was listed and heard, and a pass‑over was granted on the petitioner's request. During the final hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition and was advised of the option to file a separate election petition if needed. The court accepted the withdrawal and ordered the writ petition to be disposed of as withdrawn, granting liberty to the parties to pursue any other statutory remedies. All other contentions raised by the parties were left open for future proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition filed under Article 226 can be withdrawn by the petitioner at any stage of the proceedings.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • election officer
  • procedural law

Judgment

         Digitally
         signed by
         TRUPTI
TRUPTI   SADANAND
SADANAND BAMNE
BAMNE    Date:
         2026.01.02                                                               6-wp-15-2026.odt
         19:27:09
         +0530




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 15 OF 2026

                      Tushar Panditrao Bhartiya                            … Petitioner
                            versus
                      The Returning / Election Officer
                      (The Sub Divisional Officer, Tiosa/
                      Bhatukli) and Others                                 … Respondents


                      Mr.S.M.Vaishnav (through video conferencing) for the Petitioner.
                      Mr.Shajal Sarda (through video conferencing) for Respondent
                      No.1.
                      Mr.Ashok T. Gade with Ms.Riya John i/b. Mr.Devendra Pawar for
                      Respondent No.2.
                      Mr.Rahul Dharmadhikari       (through video conferencing) for
                      Respondent No.3.
                                                     ----

                                            CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
                                                   (VACATION COURT)

                                            DATE     : 2nd JANUARY, 2026

                      P.C. :-


                      1.            This matter was heard for some time.



                      2.            A Pass over was granted on request.



                      3.            When the matter was called out at the end of the board,

                      as a pass-over matter, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner


                      Trupti                            1 of 2
                                                           6-wp-15-2026.odt




submits, on instructions from the Petitioner, that the Petitioner

desires to withdraw the Petition. If advised, the Petitioner may avail

of the statutory remedy of filing an Election Petition.



4.           In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed off

as withdrawn, with liberty. All contentions of all the stakeholders

are kept open.




                                      (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
                                         (VACATION COURT)




Trupti                            2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.