Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHAN KESHAVRAO DUNAKHEversusKOMAL MOHAN DUNAKHE

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous because the parties had settled the dispute and the underlying criminal proceedings were withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Mohan Keshavrao Dunakhe and Respondent Komal Mohan Dunakhe filed criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency, they jointly filed a pursis before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon, stating that their dispute was resolved. The J.M.F.C. ordered the criminal proceedings to be withdrawn, and the execution proceedings were also withdrawn. The Court observed that the matter had been settled between the parties and therefore the writ petitions were no longer maintainable. Consequently, both criminal writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • The petitioners' criminal writ petitions are infructuous due to settlement and withdrawal of the underlying proceedings.

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • withdrawal of proceedings
  • infructuous
  • settlement
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:16798
                                                                          905-CRWP-151-10.odt



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2010
                                          WITH
                          CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 152 OF 2010

          Mohan Keshavrao Dunakhe                               ..PETITIONER
                VERSUS
          Komal Mohan Dunakhe                                   ..RESPONDENT

                                               ....

                                                    CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
                                                    DATE : 18th APRIL, 2026

          PER COURT :

          .          No one appears for the Petitioner and Respondent either in the

          Court Hall or through V.C.



          2.         Perused the record. Office note dated 04 th April, 2026, indicates

          that during the pendency of this petition, on 15 th December, 2011, the

          Petitioner and Respondent filed a joint pursis before the learned J.M.F.C.,

          Jalgaon, stating that the dispute between them has been resolved.

          Accordingly, the learned J.M.F.C., Jalgaon, passed the order dated 24 th

          November 2011, below Exhibit 44 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 227 of

          2009 disposing of the proceeding as withdrawn. So also, the Respondent had

          withdrawn the execution proceedings filed before the learned J.M.F.C. Thus,

          it seems that the matter has been settled between the parties before the


                                            1 / 2
                                                                    905-CRWP-151-10.odt



learned J.M.F.C., and that being so, both the petitions have become

infructuous.



3.          In view of the above, both the Criminal Writ Petitions are disposed of

as infructuous.




                                                     ( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. )
SSD




                                    2 / 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.