Bombay High Court

ZILLA PARISHAD SATARA THR ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERversusMUGUT SHRIPATI BHOSALE AND ANR

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous and disposed of.

Summary

The Zilla Parishad Satara, through its Chief Executive Officer, filed two writ petitions (904/15158/2023 and 905/16606/2023) challenging actions of the respondents. The petitioner submitted a judgment dated 31 January 2026, wherein the underlying complaints (ULP Nos. 25 and 29 of 2022) had already been decided. The court observed that the subsequent decision rendered the writ petitions moot. Consequently, the court held that the petitions were infructuous and ordered their disposal. No substantive merits of the original disputes were addressed in this order.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petitions become infructuous due to the final decision on the underlying complaints?

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
supervening events
civil appellate jurisdiction
Zilla Parishad
petition disposed

Judgment

                  1                         904--905-WP-15158-2023 (C)

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
               (904) WRIT PETITION NO. 15158 OF 2023

Zilla Parishad Satara
through Its Chief Executive Officer                …...Petitioner
       Vs.
Mugut Shripati Bhosale & Anr.                      …...Respondents
                                AND
               (905) WRIT PETITION NO. 16606 OF 2023

Zilla Parishad Satara through
Its Chief Executive Officer                        …...Petitioner
       Vs.
Dhanaji Waman Waghmode & Anr.                      …...Respondents

                                ...
Mr. N. G. Kamble i/b Dr. Uday Warunjikar, Advocate for Petitioner.
, Advocate for Respondents.
Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent-State.
                                   ...

                      CORAM :    SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
                        DATE :   24TH SEPTEMBER, 2026.

ORDER :

.        The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner tenders on
record a judgment dated 31.01.2026, whereby Complaint (ULP)
Nos.25 of 2022 and Complaint (ULP) Nos.29 of 2022 came to be
decided. In view of the supervening events, the Petition has rendered
infructuous. The Writ Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of.


                                 [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ]
Suresh

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…