Bombay High Court

ZILLA PARISHAD SATARA THR ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERversusPRAKASH DAMU MADANE AND ANR

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petitions are dismissed as they have become infructuous.

Summary

The Zilla Parishad, Satara, through its Chief Executive Officer, filed three writ petitions (Nos. 15160, 15161, 15162 of 2023) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the respondents. The petitioners sought relief, but the matter was concluded in the substantive proceedings on 31 January 2026. The learned counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the final conclusions of those proceedings rendered the writ petitions moot. The Court examined whether any further relief could be granted in view of the finality of the earlier decision. Finding that the issues raised in the writ petitions had already been finally decided, the Court held that the petitions had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court disposed of all three writ petitions as infructuous.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petitions should be dismissed as they have become infructuous due to the final conclusions of the substantive proceedings dated 31.01.2026

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
High Court
Zilla Parishad
civil appellate jurisdiction
final judgment

Judgment

                                                    903to905-WP-15160-2023 (C).doc




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                  903 WRIT PETITION NO. 15160 OF 2023

Zilla Parishad Satara Thr Its Chief Executive Officer        ...Petitioner
       Versus
Satish Ananda Kavale And Anr                                 ...Respondents

                  904 WRIT PETITION NO. 15161 OF 2023

Zilla Parishad Satara Thr Its Chief Executive Officer        ...Petitioner
       Versus
Vaibhav Prakash Bande And Anr                                ...Respondents

                  905 WRIT PETITION NO. 15162 OF 2023

Zilla Parishad Satara Thr Its Chief Executive Officer        ...Petitioner
       Versus
Prakash Damu Madane And Anr                                  ...Respondents

                                 …..
Adv. N. G. Kamble i/b Dr. Uday Warunjikar, for Petitioner.
Mr. A. A. Naik, Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar and Mr. J. P. Patil, AGPs for the
Respondents-State in WP/15160/2023, WP/15161/2023 and
WP/15162/2023 respectively.
                                 …..


                                     CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                                     DATE     : 06th OCTOBER, 2026.

P.C. :

          It is informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the

writ petitions have become infructuous due to final conclusions of the

proceedings vide Judgment dated 31.01.2026.



    ZIP                                                                1 of 2
                                                903to905-WP-15160-2023 (C).doc




2.         Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of as become

infructuous.

                                           [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.]




     ZIP                                                           2 of 2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…