Bombay High Court
ZILLA PARISHAD SATARA THR ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERversusKRISHNATH JAYSING LAVALE AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous and therefore dismissed.
Summary
The Zilla Parishad Satara, represented by its Chief Executive Officer Uday, filed Writ Petition No. 15166 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, challenging actions of respondents Krishnath Jaysing Lavale and an associate. The petitioner placed on record the judgment and order of Complaint (ULP) No. 32 of 2022 passed by the Industrial Court on 31 January 2026. The High Court examined whether the writ petition remained viable after the disposal of the underlying industrial court proceedings. Finding that the petition had become infructuous because the substantive dispute had already been resolved, the Court held there was no longer any relief to be granted. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the disposal of the underlying industrial court case
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- industrial court
- disposal
- High Court
Judgment
904-15166-2023-WP=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 15166 OF 2023
Digitally
signed by
UDAY
Zilla Parishad Satara, Thr Its Chief Executive Officer … Petitioner
UDAY SHIVAJI
SHIVAJI JAGTAP
JAGTAP Date:
2026.10.09
Vs.
16:37:00
+0530
Krishnath Jaysing Lavale and Anr. … Respondents
………….
Mr. N.G. Kamble i/b Dr. Uday Warunjikar for the Petitioner
Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent – State.
………….
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2026.
P. C. :
. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record judgment
and order in Complaint (ULP) No. 32 of 2022 passed by the Industrial
Court on 31.01.2026.
2. The Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed
of.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )
Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 1
Checking your session…