Bombay High Court
DHANRAJ JAYWANTA SURVASE ALIAS DHANGAR AND OTHERSversusDILIP JAYWANTA SURVASE ALIAS DHANGAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is held to be infructuous and is disposed of.
Summary
The petitioners, Dhanraj Jaywanta Survase alias Dhangar and others, filed a writ petition against the respondents, Dilip Jaywanta Survase alias Dhangar and others, in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the writ petition, the regular civil appeal No. 8 of 2019, which formed the factual basis of the writ, was disposed of by the District Judge, Omerga. The petitioners argued that the disposal of the appeal rendered the writ petition moot. The Court observed that with the disposal of the underlying civil appeal, there was no surviving cause of action or relief to be granted. Consequently, the Court held the writ petition to be infructuous and ordered its disposal.
Issues considered
- What is the effect on a writ petition when the underlying civil appeal on which it is based is disposed of?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil appeal
- jurisdiction
- petition disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41597
1
902 WP 15421 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 WRIT PETITION NO. 15421 OF 2023
DHANRAJ JAYWANTA SURVASE ALIAS DHANGAR AND
OTHERS
VERSUS
DILIP JAYWANTA SURVASE ALIAS DHANGAR AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Yashraj H. Gahenar i/b. Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for
the Petitioners
Mr. P. K. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.1
to 9
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 8th September 2026
P.C. :-
. Mr. Y. H. Gahenar instructed by Mr. V. D. Gunale,
learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that during
pendency of this writ petition, Regular Civil Appeal No.8 of
2019 is disposed of by learned District Judge-1, Omerga,
District Osmanabad. As such, nothing survives in this petition.
2. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…