Bombay High Court
RAJKUMAR REVANSIDHA BAMANEversusPUNE ZILLA PARISHAD YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN BHAVAN
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
A subsequent order exonerating the petitioners and treating the suspension period as duty renders further adjudication of the earlier writ petitions unnecessary.
Summary
The petitioners, Ashok Shrirang Godase and Rajkumar Revansidha Bamane, challenged an order dated 29 November 2023 that suspended them pending a departmental enquiry by the Chief Executive Officer of Pune Zilla Parishad. The respondents produced a later order dated 28 November 2025, which exonerated the petitioners and directed that the suspension period be treated as a period on duty. The High Court, noting the exoneration and the corrective order, held that further adjudication of the writ petitions was unnecessary. Consequently, the court disposed of both petitions without costs and directed that the service records reflect the exoneration and the treatment of the suspension period as duty. The decision effectively restores the petitioners' service standing and clears any disciplinary stigma.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of a subsequent exoneration order on pending writ petitions challenging an earlier suspension order?
Subjects
- suspension
- departmental enquiry
- exoneration
- service law
- writ petition
- high court
Judgment
30-WP-15503-2023.DOC
Digitally
signed by
AJIT
AJIT RAMESH
RAMESH PATHRIKAR
PATHRIKAR Date:
2026.09.29
14:44:41
+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 15503 OF 2023
Ashok Shrirang Godase ...Petitioner
Versus
Pune Zilla Parishad & Anr. ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 15504 OF 2023
Rajkumar Revansidha Bamane ...Petitioner
Versus
Pune Zilla Parishad & Anr. ...Respondents
_______
Mr. Shubham Misar for Petitioner in WP/15503/2023.
Mr. Yatin Malvankar for Petitioner in WP/15504/2023.
Mr. Ashwin R. Kapadnis for Respondent No.1.
_______
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE: 28th SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.
1. By these petitions, the Petitioners have assailed the Order dated 29 th
November 2023, whereby the Petitioners were suspended by the Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Pune, in contemplation of departmental enquiry.
2. Learned counsel for Respondent No.1 has placed on record the Order dated
28th November 2025, whereby the Petitioners have been exonerated in the
departmental enquiry and the period of suspension has been directed to be treated
as a period on duty. The Order dated 28th November 2025 passed by the
Disciplinary Authority / Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Pune, is taken on
record.
Page 1 of 2
Ajit Pathrikar
30-WP-15503-2023.DOC
3. In this view of the matter, further adjudication of these petitions is not
called for. The petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs.
4. Necessary entries regarding the exoneration of the Petitioners and treating
the period of suspension as a period on duty be made in the respective service
books of the Petitioners.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Ajit Pathrikar
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.