Bombay High Court
NEETA SADANAND PAGDHAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Neeta Sadanand Pagdhare, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and it was observed that the petitioner had lost interest in prosecuting the case. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and its School Education Department, were represented by Mr. Ketan V. Joshi. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Justices G. S. Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale on 19 August 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
Digitally
signed by
PRASHANT
PRASHANT VILAS
43-WP-15634-2024.DOC
VILAS RANE
RANE Date:
2026.08.21
10:33:53
+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 15634 OF 2024
Neeta Sadanand Pagdhare ...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary School
Education Department And Ors. ...Respondents
_______
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ketan V. Joshi, ‘B’ Panel Counsel, for the State.
_________
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
Dr.NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE: 19 AUGUST 2026.
P.C.
1. None for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to
prosecute the present proceedings.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr.NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
19 August 2026
P.V.Rane
Checking your session…