Bombay High Court
SMT. SADHANA ASHOK BARKUNDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORS
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The petitioner does not satisfy the subject‑wise seniority qualification for the post of Kendra Pramukh, and the promotion list prepared by the respondents is valid.
Summary
The petitioner, a Trained Graduate Teacher employed by the Zilla Parishad, sought a direction for promotion to the post of Kendra Pramukh, claiming she satisfied the academic qualifications stipulated in the promotion process letter dated 29 March 2023. The respondents argued that promotion to Kendra Pramukh is governed by a subject‑wise seniority list prescribed in the Government Notification of 10 June 2014 and the Government Resolution of 1 December 2022, which requires a mathematics‑related subject, whereas the petitioner’s graduation is in Advanced Accounting and Auditing. The court examined the promotion letter, the statutory resolution, and the notification, finding that the qualification clause (B.A./B.Com./B.Sc. and B.Ed.) was not a blanket criterion but subject‑specific, and the petitioner’s subject does not meet the required seniority category. Consequently, the court concluded that there was no merit in interfering with the promotion list prepared by the respondents. The petition was therefore dismissed, with a note that the petitioner may be considered for promotion in the future if she meets the requisite subject qualifications.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is eligible for promotion to Kendra Pramukh under the subject‑wise seniority criteria prescribed by the Government Notification dated 10 June 2014 and the Government Resolution dated 1 December 2022.
- Whether the academic qualification requirement (B.A./B.Com./B.Sc. and B.Ed.) in the promotion process letter suffices to include the petitioner despite her subject of Advanced Accounting and Auditing.
- Whether the respondents’ refusal to place the petitioner’s name in the promotion list violates any statutory or constitutional right.
Subjects
- promotion
- subject‑wise seniority
- Kendra Pramukh
- Zilla Parishad
- government resolution
- government notification
- educational employment
Judgment
2026:BHC-KOL:8314-DB
69-WP-15641-2023 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 15641 OF 2023
Smt. Sadhana Ashok Barkund ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
——————
Mr. Sanjiv Sawant (Through V.C.) a/w Ms. Bhakti Wast, Ms. Ketaki Patil,
for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rupesh K. Bobade for Respondent Nos.2 & 3.
Mr. R.P. Kadam, ‘B’ Panel Counsel for the Respondent-State.
——————
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 31, 2026.
P. C. :
1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner seeks a direction to the
Respondents to promote the Petitioner to the post of Kendra Pramukh /
Head of the Center Primary School and to restrain the Respondents
from taking any action for filling up the post of Kendra Pramukh.
2. The Petitioner was appointed as teacher on 27 th March, 2002, at
Zilla Parishad, District Solapur, and has completed B.Com, B.Ed, M.A.,
M.Ed. and SET. On 11th May, 2012, the Petitioner was promoted as a
Graduate Teacher and at present is working as a Trained Graduate
Teacher in all subjects at Zilla Parishad Primary School.
Jamadar-SL 1 of 5
69-WP-15641-2023 (C).doc
3. The Respondents issued promotion process letters in August and
September, 2023, and the Petitioner sent a representation for inclusion
of her name for promotion as Kendra Pramukh, which was not
responded. As the Petitioner's name did not feature in the promotion
list, the present Petition came to be filed.
4. There is an affidavit-in-reply filed by Respondent Nos. 2 & 3
contending that the Zilla Parishad had prepared a list of eligible
candidates based on subject-wise seniority for promotion to the post of
Kendra Pramukh in accordance with Government Resolution dated 1st
December, 2022, which makes a reference to the Government
Notification dated 10th June, 2014, which is valid and in force. The
seniority list of teachers is based on subject-wise seniority, which is in
consonance with the Government Notification of 10 th June, 2014. As the
Petitioner's graduation subject is Advanced Accounting and Auditing,
the Petitioner is not entitled to promotion to the post of Kendra
Pramukh in the subject wise seniority.
5. Mr. Sawant, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, would
point out that the promotion process letter dated 29 th March, 2023,
refers to B.A. / B.Com. / B.Sc. and B.Ed. with the experience of 3 years as
a trained teacher. He submits that the Petitioner satisfies the
qualification. He would further point out that accordingly, a
representation was made on 1st June, 2023, to the Block Education
Jamadar-SL 2 of 5
69-WP-15641-2023 (C).doc
Officer for including her name in the promotion list for the post of
Kendra Pramukh. He submits that by way of an affidavit-in-reply, a
completely different stand is sought to be adopted, claiming that the
seniority list on subject-wise seniority, which is not evident from the
promotion process letter dated 29th March, 2023.
6. Mr. Bobade, learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3,
would submit that the Petitioner had raised a complaint on 12 th June,
2023, wherein she has admitted that the Petitioner is B.Com. with the
subject of Advanced Accounting and Auditing. He would further point
out that the Petitioner claims the subject-wise seniority on the basis
that her graduation is connected with mathematics and therefore she is
eligible. He would submit that the promotion process letter makes it
clear that the promotion is based on subject-wise seniority and the
qualification of Advanced Accounting and Auditing cannot be
considered for the purpose of subject-wise seniority in mathematics.
7. We have considered the submissions and perused the record.
8. The promotion process letter dated 29th March, 2023, on which
reliance has been placed by Mr. Sawant, makes a reference to the
Government Resolution dated 1st December, 2022 and, in consonance
thereof, sets out that the seniority list of the primary teachers/subject-
wise teachers and Headmaster will be published and the academic
qualification is mentioned as B.A. / B.Com. / B.Sc. and B.Ed.
Jamadar-SL 3 of 5
69-WP-15641-2023 (C).doc
9. Perusal of paragraph 1 of the promotion process letter would
indicate the applicable academic qualification for different categories
and the mention of B.A. / B.Com. / B.Sc. and B.Ed. is not generalized
academic qualification for all the posts.
10. In the affidavit-in-reply, it is specifically stated that the
Government Resolution of 1st December, 2022, refers to the
Government Notification of 10th June, 2014, which provides for the
seniority list of teachers based on subject-wise seniority. The promotion
process letter dated 29th March, 2023, is in consonance with the subject-
wise seniority as prescribed in the Government Notification dated 10 th
June, 2014, and reflected in the Government Resolution of
1st December, 2022.
11. It is an admitted position that the Petitioner is a B.Com. graduate
with the subject of Advanced Accounting and Auditing. The graduation
in accounting cannot be considered for subject wise seniority in
mathematics for being promoted to the post of Kendra Pramukh. As the
promotion list has been published by the Respondent No. 3 in
accordance with the prescribed norms as per the Government
Resolution of 1st December, 2022, and the Petitioner does not possess
the prescribed subject-wise qualification, there is no warrant for
interference.
12. Resultantly, the Petition fails and stands dismissed.
Jamadar-SL 4 of 5
69-WP-15641-2023 (C).doc
13. In the event, in future the Petitioner is eligible for appointment to
the post of Kendra Pramukh, the rejection of the present Petition will
not impede her promotion, if she is otherwise qualified.
[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
Jamadar-SL 5 of 5
Checking your session…