Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PUSHPA VASUDEV GIDWANI NEE KAMALA KISHINCHAND PUNJABIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPT. OF REVENUE AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioners, Bhalchandra Pushpa Vasudev Gidwani and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the pendency of the petition, subsequent events occurred that rendered the relief sought by the petitioners moot. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court considered the submission and found no remaining cause of action. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, without addressing any substantive merits.

Issues considered

  • The petition was rendered infructuous due to subsequent events.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • disposal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO.15699 OF 2023


BHALCHANDRA           Pushpa Vasudev Gidwani Nee               ....   Petitioners
GOPAL
DUSANE                Kamala Kishinchand Punjabi,
Digitally signed by   through LHRs Kishor Vasudeo
BHALCHANDRA
GOPAL DUSANE          Gidwani & Ors.
Date: 2026.09.05
12:58:30 +0530

                                     Vs.

                      State of Maharashtra & Ors.              ....   Respondents


                      Mr. Chinmay Patil a/w Shahnawaz Siddique h/f Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni for
                      Petitioners.
                      Ms. Sulbha Chipade, AGP for Respondent-State.
                      Ms. Richika Kadam i/b Little & Co. for Respondent no. 9.

                                                        CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
                                                        DATE   : 2nd September 2026

                      P.C. :


                      1.       Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that, in view of

                      the subsequent events, the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous.

                      2.       In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of as

                      having become infructuous.



                                                                         [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ]


                                                             1/1
                      25 WP 15699.23.doc                                                      Dusane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.