Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ABDUL HAQ MOHD. YASIN ANSARIversusINSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MAHARASHTRA POLICE COMMISSIONERATE AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case.

Summary

The petitioner, Abdul Haq Mohd. Yasin Ansari, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after February 22, 2021, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal reflects the court's procedural stance that a petition must be actively pursued by the petitioner to merit consideration.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and does not take steps to advance the petition

Subjects

  • non-prosecution
  • petition dismissal
  • writ petition
  • court procedure
  • petitioner's absence

Judgment

                ssm                                                    16-wp157.2021.doc

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 157 OF 2021

           Abdul Haq Mohd. Yasin Ansari                               …..Petitioner

                    Vs.

           Inspector General Of Police,
           Maharashtra Police Commissionerate & Ors.                  …..Respondents

                               ____________________________________

           None for the Petitioner.
           Shri. S. V. Gavand APP, for the Respondent-State.
           Adv. Anoop Patil, through V.C. for the Respondent No.7-SRA.
                             ____________________________________

                                             CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                           KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                               DATE :      29th AUGUST, 2026.

           P.C.:-

           1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

           2)             Record indicates that, after 22nd February, 2021, neither the

           Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

           even once.

           2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

           Petition.

           3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.




          Digitally (KAMAL
                    signed KHATA, J.)                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                        1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:01 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.