Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M. SARFARAZODDIN AYAZUDDIN KAZI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition stands disposed of as infructuous because the underlying special case has already been decided.

Summary

The petitioners, M. Sarfarazoddin Ayazuddin Kazi and others, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of an FIR and the related Special Case No. 51 of 2020. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, and the State was represented by Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut. The Court learned from a resource personnel report that the Special Judge had already decided the case on 13 December 2024. Since the substantive proceedings were already concluded, the petition had no remaining relief to grant. Consequently, the Court held the petition infructuous and disposed of it.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a criminal writ petition seeking quash of an FIR when the underlying case has already been decided?

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • quashing FIR
  • infructuous petition
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38976-DB

                                                      918 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 158 OF 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        918 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 158 OF 2023

                          M. Sarfarazoddin Ayazuddin Kazi And Others
                                            VERSUS
                             The State Of Maharashtra And Another
                   __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. Saeed S. Shaikh for the Petitioners - Absent
                   Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut, APP for State
                   __________________________________________________________

                                     CORAM      : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                  VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
                                     DATE       : AUGUST 20, 2026

                   PER COURT :
                   1)             None appears for the petitioners.

                   2)             Although the direction is sought for quashing of

                   the F.I.R. as well as the proceedings in Special Case No.

                   51 of 2020 arising therefrom, as per the report of the

                   Resource Personnel of this Court dated 19.08.2026, the

                   concerned Special Judge has already decided the aforesaid

                   Special Case No. 51 of 2020 on 13.12.2024.

                   3)             In view of the above, nothing survives in the

                   present petition. The Criminal Writ Petition, therefore,

                   stands disposed of as infructuous.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)            (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                            JUDGE

                   Komal Kamble                                                  Page|1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.