Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVAJI DNYANDEO KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. CHIEF SEC. AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court may correct a clerical omission of an advocate's name in its order without prejudice to the parties.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking correction of an order dated 20 August 2026, which omitted the name of Advocate Ravindra S. Pachundkar for Respondent Nos.6, 7 and 9. The petitioner requested that the order be amended to include the advocate's name and that the corrected order be uploaded on the court's website. The court considered whether such a procedural correction could be made without affecting the substantive rights of the parties. It held that the order could be corrected to reflect the proper advocate representation as it was a clerical matter and caused no prejudice. Accordingly, the order was corrected, the revised order uploaded, and the praecipe disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a court order may be corrected to add the name of an advocate for certain respondents

Subjects

  • order correction
  • praecipe
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • writ petition
  • advocate representation

Judgment

                           sns                                                  1-wp-1585-2025.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO.1585 OF 2025

                      Shivaji Dnyandeo Kadam                                     … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                            … Respondents


                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Ravindra S. Pachundkar, for Respondent Nos.6,7 and 9.
                      Mr. B. V. Samat, Addl. GP a/w. Smt. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the
                      Respondent-State.

                                                        CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE :    28th August, 2026
                      P.C.:-

                      1)              Praecipe dated 27th August 2026, is circulated by the learned

                      Advocate for Respondent Nos.6, 7 and 9 for Speaking to the Minutes of

                      Order dated 20th August 2026.

                      2)              In the cause title of the said Order, the name of Advocate

                      Ravindra S. Pachundkar be added for Respondent Nos.6, 7 and 9.

                      3)              Order dated 20th August 2026, be corrected accordingly and

                      the corrected Order be uploaded on the official website of High Court of

                      Bombay.

                      4)              Praecipe dated 27th August 2026 is accordingly disposed off.



                                 (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
         Digitally
         signed by

SUMEDH
         SUMEDH
         NAMDEO
                                                                                                     1/1
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.09.01
         11:14:40
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.