Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HARSHA KIRAN MISTRYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition may be withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and the court allowed the withdrawal.

Summary

Harsha Kiran Mistry filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court heard the submissions of both the petitioner and the State of Maharashtra. Considering the petitioner's request, the court permitted the withdrawal of the petition. Consequently, the petition was withdrawn and the matter was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the criminal writ petition at his request

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal writ petition
  • procedural law
  • high court
  • disposal

Judgment

                                                                          14-WP-1591-2018 (CR).doc


      Shubhada S Kadam


                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1591 OF 2018

                      Harsha Kiran Mistry                                     ...Petitioner/s
                      Versus
                      The State of Maharashtra and anr.                       ...Respondent/s

                      _________________________________________________________________

                      Mr. Som Singh along with Ms. Neelesha Padavi h/f. Mr. Rajeev Sawant
                      and Associates, Advocates for Petitioner.
                      Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
                      Ms. Yashashree Raut h/f. Ms. Manish Jagtap, Advocate for Respondent
                      No.2
                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                          CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                          DATE        :   31st AUGUST, 2026.
                      P.C. :

                      1.         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for

                      respondent No.1-State.

                      2.         Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave

                      to withdraw the petition.

                      3.         Considering the submission of learned counsel for the

                      petitioner, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.



                                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR
KADAM
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR KADAM
Date: 2026.09.01
11:13:50 +0530                                        Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.