Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AJINKYA KRISHNARAO BAGDEversusASHLESHA AJINKYA BAGDE

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to keep all contentions open.

Summary

The petitioner, Ajinkya Krishnarao Bagde, filed a writ petition against Ashlesha Ajinkya Bagde. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to raise the same contentions in future proceedings. The Court, after considering the request, allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to keep the contentions open. Consequently, all pending applications in the matter were disposed of. No substantive merits of the dispute were adjudicated.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • civil procedure
  • writ petition

Judgment

                                                                                            4-WP-16163-2025 (C).doc

                             N.S.Kamble


                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 16163 OF 2025

                             Ajinkya Krishnarao Bagde                     ...Petitioner
                             VERSUS
                             Ashlesha Ajinkya Bagde                       ...Respondent
                             ____________________________________________________________
                             Ms.Yojana Gandhi, for the Petitioner.
NILAM
          Digitally signed
          by NILAM
          SANTOSH
                             Mr.Arjun Patil, for the Respondent.
SANTOSH
KAMBLE
          KAMBLE
          Date: 2026.08.25
          12:12:37 +0530
                             ____________________________________________________________
                                                                 CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                 DATE           : 24th AUGUST 2026

                             P.C. :

                             .              Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for

                             the Respondent.

                             2.             The learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks

                             leave to withdraw this Petition with liberty to keep all contention of the

                             Petitioner’s open while hearing of the Petition.

                             3.             Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the

                             Petitioner, the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                             4.             All pending Applications are disposed of.



                                                                                (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                  Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.