Bombay High Court
SUNIL BAPU SADADEKAR AND ANRversusMAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and disposed of it as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioners Sunil Bapu Sadadekar and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against MHADA. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Tanaya Desia, on their instructions, applied to the Court for permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and noted that a party may withdraw a writ petition if no prejudice is caused to the respondents. Accordingly, the Court granted permission and ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn. All pending applications, if any, were also dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn at the request of the petitioners?
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
34_WP16391_25.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.16391 OF 2025
Sunil Bapu Sadadekar and another … Petitioners
Vs.
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
(MHADA) and others … Respondents
Ms. Tanaya Desai i/b. Mr. Milind Prabhune for Petitioners.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE &
SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 01, 2026
P.C. :
. Ms. Desai, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions,
seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)
MINAL Digitally signed
by MINAL
SANDIP SANDIP PARAB
PARAB
Date: 2026.09.01
15:13:29 +0530 Minal Parab
1/1
Checking your session…