Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BALRAM HARESH KHANNAversusPRERNA BALRAM KHANNA NEE MS. PRERNA DEEPAK BALLANI

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition may be withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Summary

Balram Haresh Khanna filed a writ petition against Prerna Balram Khanna in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Ameya Khot, sought leave to withdraw the petition on the ground that the dispute had been settled before the trial court. The court considered the petitioner's request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn, and any pending applications were also disposed of. No substantive merits of the dispute were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing, when the underlying dispute is settled

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • civil procedure
  • writ petition
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                              80-WP-16392-2023 (C).doc
                             S.S.Kilaje
                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 16392 OF 2023

                             Balram Haresh Khanna                                           ...Petitioner/s
                             VERSUS
                             Prerna Balram Khanna @ Ms. Prerna Deepak Ballani               ...Respondent/s

          Digitally signed
SONALI SATISH
       by SONALI

SATISH Date:
               KILAJE

       2026.10.09
                             _________________________________________________________________
KILAJE 15:19:58
       +0530




                             Mr. Ameya Khot i/b. M/s. Legal Associates, Advocate for Petitioner.
                             None for Respondent.
                             _________________________________________________________________

                                                                       CORAM        : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                       DATE         : 8th OCTOBER, 2026.
                             P.C. :

                             1.       Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

                             2.       Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions, seeks leave to

                             withdraw the petition as matter is settled before the Trial Court.

                             3.       Considering the submission of learned Counsel for the applicant, the

                             Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.

                             4.       Dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn.

                             5.       All pending applications, if any, also disposed of.



                                                                              (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.