Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BALASAHEB SITARAM UGALEversusSR. POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Balasaheb Sitaram Ugale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing on 9 June 2026 and again on 6 October 2026 when the petition was called out. The court noted that the petitioner had not shown any interest in prosecuting the petition. Consequently, the court concluded that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the relief sought. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear for hearing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • non‑appearance
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                  Sbw                                                   21-WP-1643-2026.doc

                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    WRIT PETITION NO.1643 OF 2026

                             Balasaheb Sitaram Ugale                              … Petitioner

                                      V/s.

                             Sr. Police Inspector,
                             Pant Nagar Police Station & Ors.                     … Respondents




                             None for the Petitioner.
                             Mr. Ajay S. Patil, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                               CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                                  DATE :    6th October, 2026

                             P.C.:-

                             1)          Despite circulating the Petition, none appears when called out for

                             hearing.

                             2)          Record indicates that, even on earlier occasion i.e. 9 th June, 2026,

                             none had appeared for the Petitioner.

                             3)          It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the

                             Petition.

                             4)           Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                         (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                   (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANDHYA
SANDHYA   BHAGU
BHAGU     WADHWA
WADHWA    Date:
          2026.10.08
          18:47:41 +0530                                                                                      1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.