Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LATA KARBHARI JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR OF AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court ordered the State to decide the petitioner’s proposal and release the arrears of pension commutation within six weeks, in accordance with the 5 February 2021 Government Resolution.

Summary

Lata Karbhari Jadhav filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the release and payment of arrears of pension commutation as directed by the Government of Maharashtra’s resolution dated 5 February 2021. The petitioner’s proposal, forwarded by a college (Respondent No.3) to the State (Respondent No.1), was attached as Exhibit C. The High Court examined whether the State is bound to honor the resolution and pay the arrears. It held that the proposal must be decided in accordance with law, taking the government resolution into account. The Court directed the respondents to decide the matter and release the arrears within six weeks, and dismissed the petition without costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether the State of Maharashtra is obligated to release and pay arrears of pension commutation to the petitioner under the Government Resolution dated 5 February 2021.
  • Whether the petitioner's proposal forwarded by the college should be adjudicated by the State under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Subjects

  • Article 226
  • Writ Petition
  • Pension Commutation
  • Arrears of Pension
  • Government Resolution
  • High Court of Bombay
  • Maharashtra

Judgment

         Digitally
         signed by
         PRASHANT
PRASHANT VILAS
                                                                                          9-WP-16525-2023.DOC
VILAS    RANE
RANE     Date:
         2026.08.21
         10:33:54
         +0530




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 16525 OF 2023

            Lata Karbhari Jadhav                                                     ...Petitioner
                  Versus
            The State Of Maharashtra
            Through Its Director Of And Ors                                          ...Respondents
                                                _______
            Mr. Govind Solanke, for the Petitioner.
            Mr. P.N.Diwan, AGP for the State.
                                               _________
                                                     CORAM:          G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                     Dr.NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

                                                     DATE:           19 AUGUST 2026.

            P.C.

            1.         This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed

            praying for the following substantive relief:

                          “A)        This Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents to
                          release and pay the arrears of commutation amount to the Petitioner, as per
                          the Government Resolution dated 5th February, 2021;”

            2.         We find from paragraph 7 to the petition that a proposal of the petitioner

            has been forwarded by the College to respondent No.1. It is relevant to extract the

            contents of paragraph 7 which read thus:

                          “7. Petitioner states that in view Government Resolution dated 5 th February,
                          2021 issued by Government of Maharashtra, on 9 th August, 2021
                          Respondent No.3 College forwarded the Petitioner’s proposal to Respondent
                          No.1, for the payment of arrears of commutation of pension to the Petitioner.
                          Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit “C” is a copy of proposal dated 9 th
                          August,2021.”

            3.         In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the proposal of the

            petitioner, if not already decided, let the same be decided in accordance with law,


                                                    Page 1 of 2
                                                  19 August 2026
            P.V.Rane
                                                                     9-WP-16525-2023.DOC



after taking into consideration Government Resolution dated 5 February 2021, as

expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of six weeks from today.

All contentions of the parties in that regard are expressly kept open.

4.         Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs.




(Dr.NEELA GOKHALE, J.)                                     (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)




                                      Page 2 of 2
                                    19 August 2026
P.V.Rane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.