Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ZILLA PARISHAD SATARA THR ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERversusSACHIN ABA SHINDE AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petitions are infructuous and are disposed of.

Summary

The Zilla Parishad Satara, through its Chief Executive Officer, filed three writ petitions (Nos. 15134, 15140, and 16614 of 2023) challenging actions of the respondents. The petitioners submitted the final judgments and orders dated 31.01.2026 from the Industrial Court, Maharashtra, Satara, which had partly allowed the complaints. The High Court observed that the Industrial Court's determinations rendered the writ petitions moot. Consequently, the Court held that the petitions had become infructuous. The writ petitions were therefore disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petitions remain maintainable after the Industrial Court's final judgment that partly allowed the complaints

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • Industrial Court
  • Zilla Parishad
  • disposal

Judgment

                                                   906,907&908-WP-15134-2023 (C).doc




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                   906 WRIT PETITION NO. 15134 OF 2023

         Zilla Parishad Satara Thru Its Chief Executive Officer And Ors
                                    VERSUS
                         Mr. Gokul Dilip Lavale And Anr

                   907 WRIT PETITION NO. 15140 OF 2023

    Zilla Parishad Satara, Through Its Chief Executive Officer And Ors
                                 VERSUS
                     Mr. Javed Musa Sayyad And Anr

                   908 WRIT PETITION NO. 16614 OF 2023

              Zilla Parishad Satara Thr Its Chief Executive Officer
                                    VERSUS
                           Sachin Aba Shinde And Anr

                                    …..
Adv. N. G. Kamble i/b Dr. Uday Warunjikar, for Petitioners.
Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondents-State in Sr. No.906
and 908.
Mr. J. P. Patil, AGP for the Respondents-State in Sr. No.907.
                                    …..


                                      CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                                      DATE     : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026.

P.C. :

          The learned counsel for the petitioners tenders on record final

judgments and orders dated 31.01.2026 rendered by the Industrial

Court, Maharashtra, at Satara, partly allowing the complaints (ULP).



    ZIP                                                                 1 of 2
                                                   906,907&908-WP-15134-2023 (C).doc




Hence, the writ petitions have become infructuous.

2.         The writ petitions are disposed of as become infructuous.



                                                [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.]




     ZIP                                                                2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.