Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHAUSAHEB KASHINATH KADNARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to comply with procedural requirements.

Summary

Bhausaheb Kashinath Kadnar filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1674 of 2022 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to remove office objections and did not obtain the required circulation after filing the petition. The court observed that this indicated a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No merits of the substantive issues were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to remove office objections and obtain circulation?

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • procedural default
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                     (1)
                                                    918 Cri.WP-1674.2022.odt
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

     918 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1674 OF 2022

             BHAUSAHEB KASHINATH KADNAR
                        VERSUS
         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         None for the petitioner.
           Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for respondents-State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                            VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                    DATED       : 16th September, 2026

Per Court :

1.    None for the petitioner.

2.    The record shows that the petitioner neither removed

office objections nor obtained circulation after filing this

petition. Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested

in prosecuting the matter, and therefore, the petition stands

dismissed for non prosecution.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)                    (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
       JUDGE                                       JUDGE




VD_Dhirde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.