Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S. RIDDHI SIDDHI FOOD PRODUCTS THR. ITS PARTNER SHASHIKANT S. PATILversusTHE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF CENTAL GST DIVISION III, AND ORS.

Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, M/s Riddhi Siddhi Food Products and its partner Shashikant S. Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the Assistant Commissioner of Central GST Division III. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no impediment, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the GST dispute were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • What is the procedure for withdrawing a writ petition pending before the High Court?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • GST
  • high court procedure

Judgment

                                                                                   501-WP-1678-2026.doc



          Digitally signed            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          by HARISH
          VITHAL
HARISH
VITHAL
          CHAUDHARI                            CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CHAUDHARI Date:
          2026.08.25
          20:12:25
                                                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
          +0530



                                             WRIT PETITION NO.1678 OF 2026

                       M/s. Riddhi Siddhi Food Products
                       Thr. Its partner Shashikant S. Patil                  ...Petitioner.
                                 Versus
                       The Asst. Commissioner of
                       Central GST Division III And Others.                  ...Respondents.

                                                        ——————
                       Mr. Soham V. Pawar a/w Pratik B. Bhakare i/b Anand S. Patil for the Petitioner.
                       Ms. Divya Arvind Pawar Patil a/w Trupti T. Padekar for the Respondents.

                                                        ——————

                                                          Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                      Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                          Date      : August 25, 2026.
                       P. C. :

                       1.        Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions,

                       seeks permission to withdraw the petition.

                       2.        The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.



                         [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                         [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




                       Harish                              1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.