Bombay High Court
MADRASSA ARABIA RIZVIA GOUSIYA MASJIDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 5 ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directed that the petitioner may file the application for NOC within three weeks and the Home Department must decide it on its merits, uninfluenced by the 2017 order.
Summary
The petitioners, Madrassa Arabia Rizvia Gousiya Masjid, sought to set aside a 2017 order of the Maharashtra Home Department and to obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for completing construction of their masjid on land earmarked by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC). The Division Bench had earlier directed the respondent (MIDC) to consider an amended plan and, if approved, allowed the petitioner to apply to the Home Department for permission within a week, with the application to be decided on its merits. The petitioner had not filed the required application despite MIDC granting approval. The present Court reiterated the earlier directions, granting the petitioner a further three‑week period to file the application and ordering the Home Department to decide it without reference to the 2017 order. The Court disposed of the writ petition and all connected interim applications, leaving the parties' substantive rights open for future litigation.
Issues considered
- What procedural steps must the petitioner follow to obtain a No Objection Certificate from the Home Department for construction of the masjid?
- Whether the Home Department must decide the petitioner's application independently of the earlier 2017 order.
Subjects
- Masjid construction
- No Objection Certificate
- Home Department
- MIDC
- Writ petition
- Administrative direction
- Religious institution
- Procedural compliance
Judgment
1 of 6 14-WP-171-2020 (2)
Sagar Magar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 171 OF 2020
Madrassa Arabia Rizvia Gousiya
Masjid … Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Through Public Prosecutor And 5 Ors. ... Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1639 OF 2020
Madrassa Arabia Rizvia Gousiya
Masjid … Applicant
Versus
Through Public Prosecutor And 5 Ors. ... Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7667 OF 2025
Madrassa Arabia Rizvia Gousiya
Masjid G.B.B.S.D. … Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra,
Through Public Prosecutor And Ors. ... Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 30204 OF 2026
Madrassa Arabia Rizvia Gousiya
Masjid G.B.B.S.D. … Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra,
Through Public Prosecutor And Ors. ... Respondents
2 of 6 14-WP-171-2020 (2)
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2083 OF 2023
Chetna Nalin Shah … Applicant
Versus
Madrassa Arabia Rizvia Gousiya
Masjid G.B.B.S.D. and 7 Ors. ... Respondents
__________
Mr. Sachin Dhakephalkar for Petitioner in WP/171/2020 and
Applicant in IAL/30204/2026.
Mr. Suraj Gupte, AGP for the Respondent No. 1 to 4 – State.
Mr. Prashant Chawan, Senior Advocate, a/w Ms. Komal Jadhav i/b
Vavdeep Vora and Associates for Respondent No. 5-MIDC in
WP/171/2020.
Mr. Ashish Kamat, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Varuj Dhond, Mr. A. R.
Mishra for Respondent No. 6.
Mr. Yatin Shashikant Kochare a/w Ms. Priya Rombade i/b Bharat
Joshi for Intervener in IA/2083/2023.
__________
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.
DATE : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026
PC :
1) The present petition is filed for setting aside the
Order/letter dated 28th August 2017 issued by the Respondent
No.2 – State of Maharashtra, Home Department, Mantralaya,
Mumbai and for further direction to the Respondent No. 2 to issue
No Objection Certificate or necessary directions to enable the
3 of 6 14-WP-171-2020 (2)
Respondent No. 6 to complete the construction work of the Masjid
as per plans approved by Respondent No. 5 – MIDC.
2) In the present petition, the previous Division Bench of
this Court, vide Order dated 4th August 2022, had issued certain
directions which are advantageous to note. The entire Order for
ready reference reads thus:-
“1. In pursuance of the order passed by this Court, the
respondent no.6 has filed an affidavit stating that in the
approved lay out plan, the respondent no.6 has earmarked
in red colour an area for constructing the proposed
masjid. However, the proposal to construct the proposed
masjid on the location earmarked in red is yet to receive
approval from MIDC and NOC from Home Department,
Government of Maharashtra. The respondent no.6 has
rendered an undertaking in the said affidavit to submit
the amended plan for the proposed masjid to be
constructed on the location of the said property to MIDC
within such time as this Court deems fit. Statements made
by the respondent no.6 in the said affidavit are accepted.
2. The respondent no.6 is accordingly directed to submit
the amended plan for the proposed masjid to be
constructed on the location earmarked in red colour in the
plan annexed to the said affidavit to the MIDC within two
weeks from today. Learned counsel for the respondent
no.6 states that her client would comply with such order
without fail and would submit the said amended plan
within the stipulated time. Statement is accepted.
4 of 6 14-WP-171-2020 (2)
3. Upon receipt of such amended plan from the
respondent no.6, MIDC to consider such plan and to pass
appropriate order within three weeks from the date of
receipt of such plan and shall communicate the decision
that would be taken by the petitioner as well as the
respondent no.6 within three days from the date of
passing such order.
4. If any approval is granted by MIDC to construct the
proposed masjid on the proposed location, the petitioner
would be at liberty to apply for permission of the Home
Department, Government of Maharashtra by making an
application within one week from the date of passing such
order. If any such application is made by the petitioner for
seeking permission from the Home Department,
Government of Maharashtra, the same shall be considered
on its own merits and in accordance with law within two
weeks from the date of such application without being
influenced by the observations made and the conclusion
drawn in the order dated 28th August, 2017 which is
subject matter of this petition.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent no.6 on instructions
states that the area as agreed by and between the parties
to the consent terms filed in the civil suit would be offered
to the petitioner at the place earmarked in red colour in
the affidavit in reply filed by the respondent no.6.
Statement is accepted.
6. Place the matter on board under the caption of
"Directions" on 20th October, 2022.”
As can be seen, the said Order gave specific directions
which are to be followed by different parties. In paragraph 4, the
5 of 6 14-WP-171-2020 (2)
Petitioner was granted liberty to apply for permission of the Home
Department, Government of Maharashtra by making an
application within one week from the date of passing of the Order
of approval granted by MIDC.
We are informed that MIDC has already granted
approval, but no such application is preferred by the Petitioner to
the Home Department.
3) Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that
the Petitioner shall make such an application within a period of 3
weeks from today. He submitted that direction be issued that such
application be decided expeditiously without being influenced by
the earlier Order dated 28th August, 2017.
4) Since the earlier Division Bench has already issued
directions of this nature, the Petition can be disposed of by
permitting the Petitioner to prefer such application within a period
of 3 weeks from today. The Home Department shall take a decision
on his application without being influenced by the earlier Order as
passed. With these directions, the petition is disposed of. With the
6 of 6 14-WP-171-2020 (2)
disposal of the petition, all the connected Applications are also
disposed of. It is made clear that the rights and contentions of all
the parties including the intervener are specifically kept open to be
agitated at the appropriate time before the appropriate forum.
(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Digitally
signed by
SAGAR
SAGAR SANTOSH
SANTOSH MAGAR
MAGAR Date:
2026.09.07
17:22:01
+0530
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.