Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

UMESH VASNT MUNDEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATION AND ORS.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court directed Respondent No.3 to decide the representation within eight weeks, thereby granting the relief sought.

Summary

The petitioner, Umesh Vasnt Mundekar, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for Respondent No.3 to decide a representation dated 09 September 2025. The petition was limited to obtaining an order for timely consideration of that representation. The Court examined whether it could compel the administrative authority to act within a specific period. It held that the Court may issue such a direction to ensure expeditious decision-making. Accordingly, the Court ordered Respondent No.3 to decide the representation within eight weeks from the date of the order and disposed of the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct an administrative authority to decide a pending representation within a stipulated time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • representation
  • administrative direction
  • expeditious decision
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                                                     35-WP-1716-2026.doc


          Digitally signed
          by HARISH
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
HARISH    VITHAL
VITHAL    CHAUDHARI                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CHAUDHARI Date:
          2026.09.07
          11:48:33 +0530                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 1716 OF 2026

                        Umesh Vasnt Mundekar                                 ...Petitioner.
                                 Versus
                        State Of Maharashtra
                        Thr. Principal Secretary Department
                        Of Cooperation And Others                            ...Respondents.

                                                         ——————
                        Ms. Siddheshwari R. Chawan i/b Mr. R. L. Chavan for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. Nelson Rajan, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                                         ——————

                                                            Coram :    Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                       Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                            Date     : September 04, 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.        The limited grievance in the petition is for a direction to decide

                        the representation dated the 09.09.2025, addressed to Respondent

                        No.3.

                        2.        As the representation has been pending since 2025, the

                        Respondent No. 3 is directed to decide the same expeditiously, and in

                        any event, within a period of eight weeks from today.

                        3.        The petition is disposed of in the above terms.



                             [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                     [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




                        Harish                              1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.