Bombay High Court
SANJAY ASARAM GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
A writ petition filed after the lapse of the prescribed limitation period is deemed infructuous and must be dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Sanjay Asaram Gaikwad, filed a writ petition (19 WRIT PETITION NO. 1724 OF 2012) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was argued by Mr. Sharayu K. Dhanture on behalf of Mr. R.V. Gore. The Court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the relief sought in the petition could no longer be granted. It held that the petition had become infructuous because it was filed beyond the applicable limitation period. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous without addressing any substantive merits.
Subjects
- limitation period
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:45832-DB
(1) wp1724.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
19 WRIT PETITION NO. 1724 OF 2012
SANJAY ASARAM GAIKWAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Mr. Sharayu K. Dhanture h/f. Mr. R.V. Gore, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Wani, AGP for the respondent-State.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT &
JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 29.09.2026
PC :-
01. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner at the outset
informs that by efflux of time, the prayers in the petition do not survive.
02. In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands disposed off as
infructuous.
[JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]
snk/2026/Sep26/wp1724.12
Checking your session…